RUSSELL & CO. v. SANCHO

No. 3236.

92 F.2d 821 (1937)

RUSSELL & CO. v. SANCHO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

November 9, 1937.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George M. Wolfson, of New York City (Francis E. Neagle and Rounds, Dillingham, Mead & Neagle, all of New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

William C. Rigby, of Washington, D. C. (B. Fernandez Garcia, Atty. Gen., of Puerto Rico, and Nathan R. Margold, Sol. for Dept. of Interior, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BINGHAM, WILSON, and MORTON, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

This court is unable to say that the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico was clearly wrong in ruling and holding that the machine described in plaintiff's complaint was a tractor and taxable as such under the provisions of section 16, par. 8, of the Internal Revenue Law of Puerto Rico 1925, No. 85, as amended by Act No. 83, § 16, par. 8, of 1931.

In this situation the plaintiff cannot recover the additional tax which it paid under protest, and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases