1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 18 F.Supp.
  5. 18 F.Supp. 65 (1937)
 

WILKES BARRE LACE MFG. CO. v. MUNDY

No. 3780.

18 F.Supp. 65 (1937)

WILKES BARRE LACE MFG. CO. v. MUNDY.

District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania.

January 28, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. R. Van Deusen, of Scranton, Pa., and Ivins, Phillips, Graves & Barker, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Frederick V. Follmer, U. S. Atty., of Scranton, Pa., Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., and F. E. Youngman, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for defendant.

WATSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff sued the collector of internal revenue for the recovery of the sum of $119,959.69, which the plaintiff claims was wrongfully exacted as processing and floor taxes under the Agricultural Adjustment Act (as amended [7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq.]). Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the proceedings on the ground that by the provisions of title 7 of the Revenue Act of 1936 (sections 901-917 [7 U.S.C.A. §§ 623 note, 644-659...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases