PER CURIAM.
Following our decision in this case rendered December 7, 1936,
"1. The decision overlooks the fact that during the pendency of the motion period in Interference No. 66,239, the applicant Lyon did file a timely motion to amend * * * requesting a new interference based on...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.