BLAND, Associate Judge.
Claims 1, 17, 18, and 19, being all the claims on appeal, of appellant's application for motor-driven food churning devices, were rejected by the Primary Examiner of the United States Patent Office, no claims being allowed. Upon appeal to the Board of Appeals, the decision of the Examiner was affirmed, and appeal has been taken here for review of the decision of the Board.
Appellant's device is a unit to be placed in the freezing compartment...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.