1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 94 F.2d
  5. 94 F.2d 664 (1937)
 

WILLIAM B. SCAIFE & SONS CO. v. DRISCOLL

No. 6475.

94 F.2d 664 (1937)

WILLIAM B. SCAIFE & SONS CO. v. DRISCOLL, Collector of Internal Revenue.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

November 10, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmund W. Arthur and J. M. Magee, both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Paul S. McMahon, of Washington, D. C., and Charles F. Uhl, U. S. Atty., and Orris Bennett, Special Asst. to U. S. Atty., both of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee.

Before BUFFINGTON and BIGGS, Circuit Judges, and WATSON, District Judge.

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

Upon July 29, 1936, the appellant, a manufacturing corporation doing business in a suburb of Pittsburgh, filed with the collector of internal revenue at Pittsburgh its capital stock return to serve as a basis for capital stock tax and excess profits tax, in which the value of the appellant's capital stock was stated by it to be $600,000. On the 3rd day of September, 1936, according to the allegations of the bill of complaint, it was discovered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases