1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 21 F.Supp.
  5. 21 F.Supp. 722 (1937)
 

SCHICK DRY SHAVER v. MOTOSHAVER, INC.

No. 1274(J) M.

21 F.Supp. 722 (1937)

SCHICK DRY SHAVER, Inc., et al. v. MOTOSHAVER, Inc., et al.

District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

December 6, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Gibbs McAdoo, of Los Angeles, Cal., Abraham Tulin, of New York City, and E. Walter Guthrie, of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Oscar A. Mellin, of Oakland, Cal., and Hill, Morgan & Bledsoe, by Kenneth K. Wright, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.

McCORMICK, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity for the infringement of three patents. All of the patents are for shaving implements or shaving machines and were issued to Jacob Schick. They are respectively No. 1,721,530, No. 1,747,031, and No. 1,757,978. The first and second named complainant corporations are, respectively, the exclusive licensee and the owner of the patents in suit, and the last-named plaintiff is the sole distributor throughout the State of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases