1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 22 F.Supp.
  5. 22 F.Supp. 705 (1937)
 

LEWIS I. STITCH MACH. CO. v. COLUMBIA B. MACH. MFG. CORP.

22 F.Supp. 705 (1937)

LEWIS INVISIBLE STITCH MACH. CO. v. COLUMBIA BLINDSTITCH MACH. MFG. CORPORATION (three cases).

District Court, S. D. New York.

December 17, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor D. Borst, of New York City (S. George Tate, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Henry L. Burkitt, of New York City, for defendant.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

I hold that the single claim of the table patent No. 1,764,573 is invalid as not involving any inventive act over the prior art.

I hold that claims 1, 3, 8, and 10 of the automatic disc patent No. 1,905,291, on which the plaintiff relies in the first cause of action, are valid but not infringed.

I hold that claims 1, 19, 20, 21, and 22 of the automatic disc patent No. 1,989,602, on which the plaintiff relies in the first cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases