AUTOMATIC TOY CORPORATION v. BUDDY "L" MFG. CO.


19 F.Supp. 668 (1937)

AUTOMATIC TOY CORPORATION v. BUDDY "L" MFG. CO. et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

April 16, 1937.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl E. Ring, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Emery, Varney, Whittemore & Dix, of New York City, for defendants.


PATTERSON, District Judge.

The suit is for infringement of letters patent. The bill alleges that the defendants have a place of business in the district and have committed acts of infringement here. In due course the defendants put in an answer on the merits, denying infringement and claiming that the patent sued on is invalid. In paragraph 4 of the answer it is set forth that the court is without jurisdiction because the defendants are not inhabitants of the district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases