1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 93 F.2d
  5. 93 F.2d 449 (1937)
 

GOESS v. LUCINDA SHOPS

Nos. 37, 38.

93 F.2d 449 (1937)

GOESS v. LUCINDA SHOPS, Inc., et al. SAME v. BLUMENTHAL.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 6, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schwartz & Frohlich, of New York City (Louis D. Frohlich and Herman Finkelstein, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Conboy, Hewitt, O'Brien & Boardman, of New York City (Martin Conboy, David Asch, and Hobart L. Brinsmade, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

One of the suits was brought by the plaintiff as receiver of the Harriman National Bank & Trust Company to recover the amount due on a promissory note for $1,500 made by the defendant Lucinda Shops, Inc., on December 21, 1932, payable, and delivered, to the above-named bank and indorsed by the defendant A. D. H. Holding Corporation and by the appellant before delivery.

The other suit was on three causes of action; an overdraft on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases