1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 21 F.Supp.
  5. 21 F.Supp. 513 (1937)
 

WHITINSVILLE SPINNING RING CO. v. R. K. LAROS SILK CO.

Nos. 8615, 8617.

21 F.Supp. 513 (1937)

WHITINSVILLE SPINNING RING CO. et al. v. R. K. LAROS SILK CO. (two cases).

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

April 28, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sundheim, Folz & Sundheim, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Cushman, Darby & Cushman (by Arlon V. Cushman and William M. Cushman), all of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

Edmonds, Obermayer & Rebmann, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Jeffery, Kimball & Eggleston (by Oscar W. Jeffery and Harry G. Kimball), all of New York City, for defendant.

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

These two suits in equity for patent infringement were tried together. They are admittedly defended by the manufacturer, Whitin Machine Works, which will be referred to as the defendant, though the record party is a user. The patents are United States No. 1,781,828 to Whiteley, and United States No. 1,899,635 to Powrie. Validity and infringement of both are involved. There was also a question as to the inventorship of the Powrie patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases