1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 90 F.2d
  5. 90 F.2d 421 (1937)
 

MONOCACY BROADCASTING CO. v. PRALL

No. 6818.

90 F.2d 421 (1937)

MONOCACY BROADCASTING CO. v. PRALL et al.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided April 19, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Ridgely Sappington, of Baltimore, Md., and Stuart T. Saunders and J. V. Morgan, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Hampson Gary, George B. Porter, and Fanney Neyman, all of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, GRONER, and STEPHENS, Associate Justices.

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia granting a motion of the appellee to dismiss a bill of complaint filed by appellant. The appellant was plaintiff below, the Federal Communications Commission was defendant, and the parties will be so named in this opinion.

It was alleged in substance in the plaintiff's bill that on June 7, 1935 the plaintiff, the Monocacy Broadcasting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases