1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 20 F.Supp.
  5. 20 F.Supp. 376 (1937)
 

SLAYTER & CO. v. UNITED STATES INSULATION CORPORATION

20 F.Supp. 376 (1937)

SLAYTER & CO. v. UNITED STATES INSULATION CORPORATION.

District Court, S. D. New York.

August 31, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gifford, Scull & Burgess, of New York City (Newton A. Burgess and Joseph V. Meigs, both of New York City, and C. B. Belknap, of Toledo, Ohio, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Norton & Simmons, of New York City (M. Theodore Simmons, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

My decision herein is for the plaintiff. I hold the single claim of the reissued patent, No. 19,929, valid and infringed.

I. This cause, as it now comes before me, is based on the single claim of reissue patent No. 19,929, for a method of heat insulating.

There is not any question of the proper venue being in this district; incorporation of the parties is not disputed, and the locus standi of the plaintiff is established, for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases