TROTT v. CULLEN

No. 1329.

87 F.2d 200 (1937)

TROTT et al. v. CULLEN et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

January 2, 1937.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carlton Hill and George I. Haight, both of Chicago, Ill., and Forrest C. Northcutt, of Denver, Colo., for appellants.

Merrell E. Clark, of New York City, Morrison Shafroth and W. W. Grant, Jr., both of Denver, Colo., J. King Harness, of Detroit, Mich., and Grant, Ellis, Shafroth & Toll, of Denver, Colo., for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, McDERMOTT, and BRATTON, Circuit Judges.


McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

The claims in suit — and with those only are we concerned — cover methods of supporting the engine unit in motor vehicles which utilize a pivotal mounting at one end and a resilient mounting at the other, with the necessary supporting fins. The majority of the court were and are of the view that, in the light of the prior art a part of which we sketched, no inventive genius was disclosed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases