1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 93 F.2d
  5. 93 F.2d 186 (1937)
 

ROOT REFINING CO. v. UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS CO.

Nos. 6329-6332.

93 F.2d 186 (1937)

ROOT REFINING CO. v. UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

December 13, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur C. Denison, of Cleveland, Ohio, and J. Bernhard Thiess and Thorley Von Holst, both of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., and William F. Hall and Charles M. Thomas, both of Washington, D. C. (Ward & Gray, of Wilmington, Del., of counsel), for appellee.

Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

These are appeals from decrees of the District Court for the District of Delaware. Universal Oil Products Company, a South Dakota corporation, hereinafter referred to as the South Dakota Company, was the owner of the Dubbs and Egloff patents No. 1,392,629 and No. 1,537,593, respectively. On March 11, 1929, and July 7, 1931, it filed bills of complaint in which it alleged that these patents had been infringed by Root Refining Company, the appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases