1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 87 F.2d
  5. 87 F.2d 190 (1937)
 

OTTENHEIMER BROS. v. LIBUWITZ

No. 4091.

87 F.2d 190 (1937)

OTTENHEIMER BROS., Inc., et al. v. LIBUWITZ.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

January 5, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City (Emanuel E. Ottenheimer, of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellants.

Edwin S. Clarkson, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before PARKER and SOPER, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS, District Judge.

SOPER, Circuit Judge.

Two patents were involved in the first appeal in this case (C.C.A.) 74 F.2d 858, the Peterson patent No. 1,206,464 and the Ottenheimer reissue patent No. 16,941 issued on April 24, 1928, upon an original application filed January 31, 1925. We held that the Peterson patent was not infringed by the defendant and remanded the case so far as the Ottenheimer patent was concerned to afford both parties a full opportunity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases