This action is one for damages caused by appellant's alleged breach of its contract. The sale of a large number (225,000) of barrel staves was the subject of the agreement. The defenses are numerous. Among them are: (a) The agreement relied upon was unilateral and therefore not binding; (b) appellee had no corporate existence when the contract was made; (c) there was lack of authority on the part of appellant's representative to make the agreement; (d) appellee first breached...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
