1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 93 F.2d
  5. 93 F.2d 143 (1937)
 

SMITH v. ROYAL INS. CO.

No. 8474.

93 F.2d 143 (1937)

SMITH v. ROYAL INS. CO., Limited.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

November 27, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. B. Bianchi, James M. Hanley, and Bianchi & Hyman, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Long & Levit, Percy V. Long, Bert W. Levit, and William H. Levit, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before DENMAN, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

This case was before us on a former appeal, Royal Insurance Company v. Smith (C.C.A.) 77 F.2d 157. It was there held that the demurrer to the complaint should have been sustained because of insufficient facts, and the cause was reversed with leave to the plaintiff to amend. Subsequently the plaintiff, who is appellant here, three times amended his pleading. A demurrer to his third amended complaint was sustained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases