1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 90 F.2d
  5. 90 F.2d 999 (1937)
 

FORD MOTOR CO. v. GORDON FORM LATHE CO.

Nos. 7363, 7364.

90 F.2d 999 (1937)

FORD MOTOR CO. v. GORDON FORM LATHE CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 4, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bodman, Longley, Bogle, Middleton & Farley, of Detroit, Mich., and Cooper, Kerr & Dunham, of New York City, for appellant Ford Motor Co.

Swan, Frye & Hardesty, of Detroit, Mich., Bottum, Hudnall, Lecher, McNamara & Michael, of Milwaukee, Wis., and Richey & Watts, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee Gordon Form Lathe Co.

Before HICKS and SIMONS, Circuit Judges, and RAYMOND, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Both parties have made application for clarification of the opinion and mandate with respect to claims 12, 23, 24, and 38 of the patent in suit. Both suggest possible but extreme and contradictory interpretations. The court's conclusion, as indicated by the opinion, that the plaintiff intended to and did withdraw the claims referred to from consideration by the court and that defendant acquiesced in this procedure, was warranted not only by the briefs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases