1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 90 F.2d
  5. 90 F.2d 959 (1937)
 

CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS v. RAINBOW LIGHT

No. 17.

90 F.2d 959 (1937)

CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS, Inc., et al. v. RAINBOW LIGHT, Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 14, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bohleber & Ledbetter, of New York City (Edwin J. Prindle, Thomas Ewing, and William Bohleber, all of New York City, of counsel), for complainants-appellants.

George F. Thompson, of New York City, for defendant-appellee.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

This is the usual patent suit brought by N. V. Philips' Gloeilampenfabrieken, the owner of United States patent No. 1,726,107, and Claude Neon Lights, Inc., its licensee, for infringement of claims 1 and 3. The invention, which was by Hertz, relates to electric discharge tubes, particularly to electric discharge tubes having a positive column light for lighting purposes. The commercial use of the tubes is for advertising signs.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases