1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 18 F.Supp.
  5. 18 F.Supp. 1017 (1937)
 

MORGAN v. UNITED STATES

No. 42535.

18 F.Supp. 1017 (1937)

MORGAN et al. v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

April 26, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Whitney and Thomas F. Boyle, both of New York City (Richard H. Wilmer, of Washington, D. C., Joseph C. White and Cravath, de Gersdorff, Swaine & Wood, all of New York City, on the brief), for plaintiffs.

J. H. Sheppard, of Washington, D. C., and Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.

Before BOOTH, Chief Justice, and GREEN, LITTLETON, WILLIAMS, and WHALEY, Judges.

LITTLETON, Judge.

Counsel for defendant contend that plaintiffs are not entitled to recover the unrefunded excess estate tax computed under section 322 of the Revenue Act of 1926 (26 U.S.C.A. § 410 note) for the reason that this suit was not instituted within six years after February 26, 1926, the date of the enactment of section 325 of the Revenue Act of 1926 (44 Stat. 87). This contention is without merit. Georges...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases