1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 17 F.Supp.
  5. 17 F.Supp. 996 (1937)
 

LOWELL v. TRIPLETT

No. 2193.

17 F.Supp. 996 (1937)

LOWELL et al. v. TRIPLETT et al.

District Court, D. Maryland.

January 13, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifton V. Edwards and Reverdy Johnson, both of New York City, John B. Brady, of Washington, D. C., and Semmes, Bowen & Semmes and Gaylord Lee Clark, all of Baltimore, Md., for plaintiffs.

Darby & Darby, Samuel E. Darby, Jr., Fish, Richardson & Neave, and Stephen H. Philbin, all of New York City, and Cook & Markell and Charles Markell, of Baltimore, Md., for defendants.

WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.

The present suit is for alleged infringement of three patents which, broadly classified, may be described as relating to radio receiving apparatus. Plaintiffs, consisting of the two patentees, Messrs. Lowell and Dunmore, and their licensee, the Dubilier Condenser Corporation, contend that all of these patents are infringed by the apparatus sold by defendants, consisting of a partnership, the Baltimore Gas Light Company, and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases