MEAD v. WELCH

No. 4071.

13 F.Supp. 981 (1936)

MEAD v. WELCH, Collector of Internal Revenue.

District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

March 11, 1936.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Claude I. Parker, Ralph W. Smith, and Ralph Kohlmeier, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Samuel W. McNabb, former U. S. Atty., Alva C. Baird, Harry Graham Balter, Ignatius F. Parker, Clyde Thomas, and Hugh L. Dickson, Asst. U. S. Attys., Peirson M. Hall, U. S. Atty., and Eugene Harpole, Sp. Atty. for Bureau of Internal Revenue, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant.


McCORMICK, District Judge.

According to the briefs in this case, but two issues remain unsettled and undecided: First, whether or not the Commissioner of Internal Revenue erred by including in the gross estate of William Mead, deceased, the sum of $115,400 transferred by decedent to others under the "Mead 1926 Trust," and, second, whether or not the Commissioner of Internal Revenue erred by including in the gross estate and subject to tax the sum of $959,638.97, representing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases