WEISS v. MAGNUSSEN

Nos. 1190, 1215.

13 F.Supp. 948 (1936)

WEISS v. MAGNUSSEN. HAYNES v. SAME.

District Court, E. D. Virginia, Richmond Division.

February 14, 1936.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Parrish, Butcher & Parrish, of Richmond, Va., for plaintiffs.

Allen & Perkinson, of Richmond, Va., for defendant.


WAY, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

After further consideration of the motions in these cases, I am of the opinion that they should be overruled.

1. As stated during the oral argument, it seems to me that under a reasonable construction the Virginia statute goes even farther than do some of the statutes which have been held not to violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. The Virginia statute provides for the process or notice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases