CUSHING v. RODMAN

No. 6465.

82 F.2d 864 (1936)

CUSHING v. RODMAN.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided February 24, 1936.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Godfrey L. Munter, Confer G. Bailey, and Harry Raymond Turkel, all of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.

J. Harry Welch, of Washington, D. C., for defendant in error.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, VAN ORSDEL, GRONER, and STEPHENS, Associate Justices.


STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

This case arises upon a writ of error to the Municipal Court of the District of Columbia, which, in an action by the plaintiff in error for damages for breach of an implied warranty, entered judgment for the defendant in error. Hereafter the parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant. The facts, which are without dispute, are as follows: The plaintiff, on November 24, 1934, at a drug store and lunch room operated by the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases