1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 83 F.2d
  5. 83 F.2d 826 (1936)
 

IN RE PALM

Patent Appeals No. 3629.

83 F.2d 826 (1936)

In re PALM et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 1, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fay, Oberlin & Fay, of Cleveland, Ohio (William R. Day, of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for appellants.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This appeal brings before us for review a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1 to 8, inclusive, of appellant's application for a patent upon the ground that said claims lacked patentability in view of the cited prior art. All of the claims are article claims.

Claims 1 and 7 are illustrative of the claims in issue and read as follows:

"1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases