C. I. T. CORPORATION v. CARL

No. 6642.

85 F.2d 809 (1936)

C. I. T. CORPORATION v. CARL.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided August 31, 1936.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Saidman and Albert E. Steinem, both of Washington, D.C., for plaintiff in error.

Charles C. Collins and Albert E. Brault, both of Washington, D. C., for defendant in error.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and VAN ORSDEL, GRONER, and STEPHENS, Associate Justices.


STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

This case arises upon a writ of error to the Municipal Court of the District of Columbia. The suit was an action brought by the plaintiff in error (hereinafter called plaintiff) to recover from the defendant in error (hereinafter called defendant) the value of an automobile sold by the United States Marshal at the instance of the defendant to satisfy a judgment. The plaintiff claimed a prior lien upon the automobile.

In its bill...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases