1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 14 F.Supp.
  5. 14 F.Supp. 74 (1936)
 

JOHN B. STETSON CO. v. STEPHEN L. STETSON CO.

14 F.Supp. 74 (1936)

JOHN B. STETSON CO. v. STEPHEN L. STETSON CO., Limited, et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Supplemental Opinion March 18, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarke & Allen, of New York City (Saul, Ewing, Remick & Saul [by Maurice B. Saul], Allen S. Olmsted, 2d, and Earl G. Harrison, all of Philadelphia, Pa., and Murray F. Johnson, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Conboy, Hewitt, O'Brien & Boardman, of New York City (Martin Conboy and David Asch, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Stephen L. Stetson Co.

Gelman & Erde, of New York City (Louis I. Gelman and Joseph George Erde, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Hutt & Wasserman.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

My decision in this cause is in favor of the plaintiff, which will have an interlocutory decree against both defendants carrying costs and giving the relief hereinafter indicated in detail.

I. This cause has two branches: First, a claim of infringement of trade-mark by the defendant Stephen L. Stetson Company, Ltd., to which it is alleged that Hutt & Wasserman, Inc., contributed; and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases