1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 13 F.Supp.
  5. 13 F.Supp. 867 (1936)
 

SUNRAY OIL CO. v. THOMPSON

No. 501.

13 F.Supp. 867 (1936)

SUNRAY OIL CO. v. THOMPSON et al.

District Court, N. D. Texas.

February 26, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Howell, of Oklahoma City, Okl., Paul Taliaferro, of Tulsa, Okl., and Sanders & Scott, of Amarillo, Tex., for complainant.

William McCraw, Atty. Gen., and William Madden Hill, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.

Before HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge, and ATWELL and McMILLAN, District Judges.

ATWELL, District Judge.

This is on motion to dismiss and on application for temporary injunction.

The Sunray Oil Company is a corporate citizen of the state of Oklahoma. It represents that it is engaged in the production of oil and gas in Moore county, Tex., where it operates a plant which cost it $100,000, and that it has a value in its oil and gas rights and interests in that county of more than $500,000. It complains...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases