1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 84 F.2d
  5. 84 F.2d 768 (1936)
 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. MAISEL TRADING POST

No. 976.

84 F.2d 768 (1936)

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. MAISEL TRADING POST, Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

July 21, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene W. Burr, of Washington, D. C., William T. Kelley, Chief Counsel, and Martin A. Morrison, Asst. Chief Counsel, both of Washington, D. C., Harry W. Blair, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles E. Collett, Atty., of Washington, D. C., and Wm. C. Lewis, U. S. Atty., of Oklahoma City, Okl., for petitioner.

John F. Simms and Donald M. Bushnell, both of Albuquerque, N. M., for respondent.

Before LEWIS and McDERMOTT, Circuit Judges, and KENNEDY, District Judge.

KENNEDY, District Judge.

This proceeding was originally instituted to enforce an order of the Federal Trade Commission, with a finding that the respondent while engaged in interstate commerce misled the public in connection with the sale of Indian jewelry. The controversy revolved around the use of the terms "Indian" and "Indian-made." Upon the original hearing the court confirmed the order of the Commission with modifications, which detailed specifically the permissive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases