1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 14 F.Supp.
  5. 14 F.Supp. 786 (1936)
 

GOLO SLIPPER CO. v. GLASS & FITZGERALD CO.

No. 3996.

14 F.Supp. 786 (1936)

GOLO SLIPPER CO., Inc., v. GLASS & FITZGERALD CO.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

May 14, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hardy, Hall & Iddings and Arthur P. Hardy, all of Boston, Mass., Mock & Blum, of New York City, and Arthur D. Thomson and Thomson & Thomson, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Aaron Kobrin, of Lynn, Mass., and Ezekiel Wolf, of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

BREWSTER, District Judge.

In this suit the defendant is charged with infringing design patent No. 87,016, issued May 24, 1932, to plaintiff. The defense is noninfringement.

The patent covers the ornamental design of a complete shoe, or sandal, substantially as shown in the drawings. According to this design, the quarter or rear portion is composed of a continuous piece of material extending around the quarter in a manner common to the ordinary shoe, and terminating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases