ELMHIRST v. DUGGAN


14 F.Supp. 782 (1936)

ELMHIRST v. DUGGAN, Collector of Internal Revenue.

District Court, S. D. New York.

January 9, 1936.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Baldwin, Hutchins & Todd, of New York City (Robert A. Young and E. Raymond Shepard, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Lamar Hardy, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Henderson Mathews and Richard Delafield, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.


PATTERSON, District Judge.

The action is to recover an alleged overpayment of income tax. The question is whether the plaintiff was entitled to deduct from her gross income for 1927 the sum of $121,124.85 paid by her in that year to the British government as super-tax. The claimed deduction was disallowed by the Commissioner, an additional assessment was made, the plaintiff paid under protest, and brought this action to recover the payment. A jury was waived.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases