1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 81 F.2d
  5. 81 F.2d 711 (1936)
 

BUTLER MFG. CO. v. ENTERPRISE CLEANING CO.

No. 10321.

81 F.2d 711 (1936)

BUTLER MFG. CO. v. ENTERPRISE CLEANING CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

January 28, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Scofield, of Kansas City, Mo. (Spencer F. Harris and Henry L. Shenier, both of Kansas City, Mo., and John H. Bruninga, of St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for appellant.

Henry M. Huxley, of Chicago, Ill. (Delos G. Haynes, of St. Louis, Mo., and Ralph Munden, of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for appellee Filtration Products Co.

Harry A. Beimes, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellee Enterprise Cleaning Co.

Before GARDNER, WOODROUGH, and VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judges.

VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.

This case involves a contest between systems employed in the dry cleaning of textile materials, such as soiled garments and the like. Appellant is the owner of three patents: The Fenton patent, No. 1,669,235, issued May 8, 1928; the Hatfield patent, No. 1,704,604, issued March 5, 1929; and the Hatfield-Alliott patent, No. 1,728,343, issued September 17, 1929. It is charged that three claims in each patent are infringed by the process...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases