IN RE NEW YORK STATE RYS.


16 F.Supp. 717 (1936)

In re NEW YORK STATE RYS.

District Court, N. D. New York.

September 26, 1936.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Willis H. Mitchell, of Syracuse, N. Y., for trustee.

Archibald L. Jackson, of New York City, for The General Finance Corporation, claimant.

Hiscock, Cowie, Bruce & Lee, of Syracuse, N. Y. (Alexander H. Cowie and Matthew R. Quinn, both of Syracuse, N. Y., of counsel), for New York Cent. R. Co., claimant.

Harris, Beach, Folger, Bacon & Keating, of Rochester, N. Y. (Keith D. Poland and Daniel M. Beach, both of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for Security Trust Co. of Rochester, trustee under consolidated mortgage.

Cook, Nathan, Lehman & Greenman, of New York City (Alfred A. Cook and Frederick F. Greenman, both of New York City, of counsel), for Lisman Committee of consolidated mortgage bondholders.

Sullivan & Cromwell, of New York City (Paul W. McQuillen, of New York City, of counsel), for Harris-Forbes Committee of consolidated mortgage bondholders.

White & Case, of New York City (Jesse E. Waid, of New York City, of counsel), for Bankers Trust Co., trustee under the first Rochester mortgage.

Hubbell, Taylor, Goodwin, Nixon & Hargrave, of Rochester, N. Y. (E. Willoughby Middleton, of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for Bankers Trust Co.

Van Schaick, Woods & Warner, of Rochester, N. Y. (Howard M. Woods, of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for first mortgage bondholders.

Mann, Strang, Bodine & Wright, of Rochester, N. Y. (Frank H. Parker, of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for Genesee Valley Trust Co., trustee under the second Rochester mortgage.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, of Philadelphia, Pa. (W. Heyward Myers, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for Genesee Valley Trust Co.


BRYANT, District Judge.

On July 2, 1936, the attorneys listed above met with me in conference for the purpose of devising methods to facilitate the issuance of a proposed plan for reorganization of the Rochester property of debtor. All were in agreement that certain disputed legal questions should be settled before any proposed plan is put forth. These questions relate to claims of various classes of creditors to certain funds. It was stipulated, on the record by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases