1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 15 F.Supp.
  5. 15 F.Supp. 689 (1936)
 

DU-ART FILM LABORATORIES v. CONSOLIDATED F. INDUSTRIES

15 F.Supp. 689 (1936)

DU-ART FILM LABORATORIES, Inc., et al. v. CONSOLIDATED FILM INDUSTRIES, Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

April 21, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bushel & Gottlieb, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Meyer H. Lavenstein, of New York City (Robert Delson, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The action is one at law, commenced in the state court and removed to this court for diversity of citizenship. The sufficiency of the complaint is brought up by motion of the defendant to dismiss.

The complaint is said by the plaintiffs to be one to recover for wrongful interference with their contractual rights. The facts alleged in the complaint, to be taken as true for present purposes, are these: The plaintiffs made contracts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases