1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 84 F.2d
  5. 84 F.2d 619 (1936)
 

ARO EQUIPMENT CORPORATION v. HERRING-WISSLER CO.

Nos. 10490, 10494.

84 F.2d 619 (1936)

ARO EQUIPMENT CORPORATION v. HERRING-WISSLER CO. HERRING-WISSLER CO. v. ARO EQUIPMENT CORPORATION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

July 6, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lynn A. Williams, of Chicago, Ill. (Williams, Bradbury, McCaleb & Hinkle, of Chicago, Ill., and Bair, Freeman & Sinclair, of Des Moines, Iowa, on the brief), for Aro Equipment Corporation.

Leonard L. Kalish, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Talbert Dick, of Des Moines, Iowa, on the brief), for Herring-Wissler Co.

Before GARDNER, SANBORN, and BOOTH, Circuit Judges.

BOOTH, Circuit Judge.

There are here an appeal and a cross-appeal from a decree entered in a suit for infringement of a patent which held the patent invalid for lack of invention; and held, further, that the license set up as one of the defenses had not been proven.

The patent in controversy is United States patent No. 1,918,833 to John F. Carter, assigned and issued to plaintiff, the Aro Equipment Corporation, application filed November 11, 1931, patent issued...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases