SKRAM CO. v. BAYER CO.

Patent Appeal No. 3616.

82 F.2d 615 (1936)

SKRAM CO. v. BAYER CO., Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 6, 1936.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarence A. O'Brien, of Washington, D. C. (Charles E. A. Smith, Thomas E. Turpin, and George C. Bladt, all of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Edward S. Rogers, of Chicago, Ill., James F. Hoge, of New York City, William T. Woodson, of Chicago, Ill., and Thomas L. Mead, Jr., of Washington, D. C. (James H. Rogers, of Chicago, Ill., and Browne & Phelps, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


GARRETT, Associate Judge.

The Skram Company here appeals from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents reversing the decision of the Examiner of Interferences who dismissed an opposition by the Bayer Company to appellant's application for registration of the word "SKRAM" printed in the form of a cross (that is both horizontally and vertically) with the middle letter "R" common to both lines; the cross being within a circle having a black background with a narrow...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases