1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 15 F.Supp.
  5. 15 F.Supp. 674 (1936)
 

BALTIMORE & O. R. CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. 2975.

15 F.Supp. 674 (1936)

BALTIMORE & O. R. CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES.

District Court, N. D. New York.

July 1, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carleton W. Meyer, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

E. M. Reidy, of Washington, D. C., for Interstate Commerce Commission.

Elmer B. Collins, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.

Before L. HAND, Circuit Judge, and COOPER and BRYANT, District Judges.

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

This is the usual suit in equity to review the action of the Interstate Commerce Commission which directed the plaintiff railroads to establish through rates in the circumstances set forth below. No other question is raised but that of the Commission's jurisdiction; if it is lawful to treat the two legs of the transportation in question as a single interstate route, the plaintiffs agree that they must lose; on the other hand the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases