1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 13 F.Supp.
  5. 13 F.Supp. 562 (1936)
 

WARREN TELECHRON CO. v. WALTHAM WATCH CO.

Nos. 3865-3868.

13 F.Supp. 562 (1936)

WARREN TELECHRON CO. v. WALTHAM WATCH CO. and three other cases.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

January 27, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hector M. Holmes, of Boston, Mass., Charles Neave and Alexander C. Neave, both of New York City, and Harrison F. Lyman, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.

Alan B. Bagley and Herbert A. Baker, both of Boston, Mass., and Harold F. Wilhelm, of New York City, for defendant.

BREWSTER, District Judge.

The above entitled infringement suits were tried together under a stipulation that the evidence, so far as relevant, should be received upon all cases. Three letters patent of the United States are involved, namely, No. 1,283,434 (referred to hereafter as the Warren clock patent); No. 1,334,423 (referred to hereafter as the Warren indicator patent); and No. 1,892,552 (referred to hereafter as the Holtz patent).

The reason for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases