PACIFIC FRUIT & PRODUCE CO. v. MARTIN

No. 569.

16 F.Supp. 34 (1936)

PACIFIC FRUIT & PRODUCE CO. v. MARTIN, Governor of State of Washington, et al.

District Court, W. D. Washington, S. D.

February 28, 1936.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patterson & Patterson, of Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff.

George W. Hamilton, Atty. Gen., State of Washington, and L. C. Brodbeck, Asst. Atty. Gen., State of Washington, for defendants.

Before HANEY, Circuit Judge, and CUSHMAN and BOWEN, District Judges.


CUSHMAN, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The foregoing statement does not include trial amendments of the bill of complaint filed after the hearing, for the reason that, because of the conclusion reached, added statement is unnecessary.

The motion of the defendants to strike certain of the allegations of the bill of complaint will be denied.

The motion to dismiss, in so far as it is stated in paragraphs I and II of the motion, will...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases