1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 81 F.2d
  5. 81 F.2d 408 (1936)
 

IN RE HAAS

Patent Appeal No. 3589.

81 F.2d 408 (1936)

In re HAAS.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 17, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gillson, Mann & Cox, of Chicago, Ill. (J. D. Cox, of Chicago, Ill., and Watts T. Estabrook, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming that of the examiner, rejecting all of the claims of appellant's application for lack of invention in view of the prior art. Twelve claims are involved, numbered 27 to 31, inclusive, and 33 to 39, inclusive. Claims 29 and 37 to 39, inclusive, are method claims, and the others are product claims.

Claims 27 and 29 are illustrative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases