1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 84 F.2d
  5. 84 F.2d 392 (1936)
 

SKRAM CO. v. BAYER CO.

Patent Appeal No. 3616.

84 F.2d 392 (1936)

SKRAM CO. v. BAYER CO., Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 17, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarence A. O'Brien, of Washington, D. C. (Charles E. A. Smith, Thomas E. Turpin, and George C. Bladt, all of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Edward S. Rogers, of Chicago, Ill., James F. Hoge, of New York City, William T. Woodson, of Chicago, Ill., and Thomas L. Mead, Jr., of Washington, D. C. (James H. Rogers, of Chicago, Ill., and Browne & Phelps, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

Following our decision in the above-styled case rendered April 6, 1936, 82 F.2d 615, 23 C.C.P.A.(Patents) ____, and within the time fixed by our rules, a petition for rehearing was filed on behalf of appellee. Appellant has filed opposition thereto.

The petition first states, in substance, that the only issue of the case is whether the marks are confusingly similar, and alleges that our decision reversing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases