1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 85 F.2d
  5. 85 F.2d 390 (1936)
 

OXFORD VARNISH CORPORATION v. AULT & WIBORG CORPORATION

No. 7005.

85 F.2d 390 (1936)

OXFORD VARNISH CORPORATION et al. v. AULT & WIBORG CORPORATION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 30, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City (Bates, Golrick & Teare and Albert R. Golrick, all of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellants.

Edmund P. Wood, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Arthur M. Smith, of Detroit, Mich., and Truman A. Herron and Wood & Wood, all of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In a petition for rehearing by the Oxford Varnish Corporation, appellant, it is urged that due to the fact that the court did not pass upon the validity of a contract between the appellant and its licensee, Horn, in the view that the issues in respect to it were moot, the petitioner is placed in the position where it will become liable to Horn for nonperformance of the contract if valid and enforceable, or be subject to another suit under the antitrust...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases