1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 84 F.2d
  5. 84 F.2d 383 (1936)
 

UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORP. v. O'DONNELL R. PRODUCTS CO.

No. 6980.

84 F.2d 383 (1936)

UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORPORATION v. O'DONNELL RUBBER PRODUCTS CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 4, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hector M. Holmes, of Boston, Mass. (Fish, Richardson & Neave, of Boston, Mass., and Bennett R. Knight, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Frank L. Zugelter, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Walter F. Murray and James B. O'Donnell, both of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellees.

Before MOORMAN, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The patent in suit, McDonald 1,661,572, is in the art of folding sheet materials as practiced in the shoe manufacturing industry. In a suit for infringement the appellant, as owner of the patent, sought to hold the Irving Drew Company liable as a direct and the O'Donnell Rubber Products Company as a contributory infringer. The court below found none of the claims of the patent infringed, and so, without decision upon their validity, entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases