1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 80 F.2d
  5. 80 F.2d 374 (1936)
 

SWAN v. THOMPSON

Patent Appeals Nos. 3542, 3543, 3545, 3546.

80 F.2d 374 (1936)

SWAN v. THOMPSON (two cases). THOMPSON v. SWAN. HOLTZMAN v. SAME.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

Rehearing Denied February 17, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William G. McKnight, of New York City (Horace A. Dodge, of Washington, D. C., and Drury W. Cooper, of New York City, of counsel), for Swan.

H. W. Kenway, of Boston, Mass. (F. S. Appleman, of Washington, D. C., and Henry R. Ashton, of New York City, of counsel), for Thompson and Holtzman.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

These cases bring before us for consideration the decisions of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office in three interferences. There are four appeals, involving four interference counts.

Priority of the subject-matter of the single count in interference No. 60,844 was, by the Examiner of Interferences, awarded to Thompson. The Board of Appeals affirmed the action of the Examiner of Interferences. In Patent Appeal No...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases