1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 87 F.2d
  5. 87 F.2d 355 (1936)
 

IN RE IMPERIAL IRR. DIST.

No. 7970.

87 F.2d 355 (1936)

In re IMPERIAL IRR. DIST. SOUTHERN SIERRAS POWER CO. v. IMPERIAL IRR. DIST.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

December 31, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hickcox & Trude, of El Centro, Cal., Henry W. Coil and D. L. King, both of Riverside, Cal., W. Coburn Cook, of Turlock, Cal., A. Heber Winder, of Riverside, Cal., and Clark, Nichols & Eltse, of Berkeley, Cal., for appellants.

Harry W. Horton and Geo. R. Kirk, both of El Centro, Cal., for appellees.

Orrick, Palmer & Dahlquist, of San Francisco, Cal., for Bondholders Protective Commission.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner for rehearing seeks opportunity to present the argument that the Imperial Irrigation District is not a "political subdivision" of the State of California and cites and relies upon Wood v. Imperial Irrigation District, 216 Cal. 748, at page 753, 17 P.2d 128, 130, where the court states in the course of its reasoning to its decision that "an irrigation district is not a political subdivision of the state or county, or a political...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases