1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 18 F.Supp.
  5. 18 F.Supp. 419 (1936)
 

THE DALZELLACE

18 F.Supp. 419 (1936)

THE DALZELLACE. DALZELL v. VALVOLINE OIL CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

February 24, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper, of New York City (Eugene Underwood, of New York City, of counsel), for libelant.

Putney, Twombly & Hall, of New York City (Lemuel Skidmore and Frederic R. Sanborn, both of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

COXE, District Judge.

This is a suit to recover for the damage alleged to have been sustained by the libelant's tug Dalzellace as a result of striking a submerged pile on land under water belonging to the respondent at Edgewater, N. J., on March 16, 1934.

The respondent maintained at Edgewater, N. J., a pier extending into the Hudson river; this pier stood on the respondent's own land; and the respondent also owned the land under water adjacent to the pier...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases