SEABOARD SURETY CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. 7678.

84 F.2d 348 (1936)

SEABOARD SURETY CO. v. UNITED STATES, for Use and Benefit of MARSHALL-WELLS CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 8, 1936.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry S. Kessler, of Boise, Idaho, and William Buchholz and Martin J. O'Donnell, both of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

Richards & Haga and Oliver O. Haga, all of Boise, Idaho, and Merwin Rankin and Dey, Hampson & Nelson, all of Portland, Or., for appellees.

Before WILBUR, DENMAN, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.


DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from a suit brought by the United States for the use of material and supply men against appellant bonding company on a bond given under the Heard Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270 (repealed August 24, 1935, 49 Stat. 794), to secure their payment for goods, supplies, and services. The bond was executed by one B. D. Morley as principal, and appellant as surety, for the performance of Morley's contract to build for the United States...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases