UTAH CONST. CO. v. SALMON RIVER CANAL CO.

No. 8011.

86 F.2d 326 (1936)

UTAH CONST. CO. v. SALMON RIVER CANAL CO., Limited.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

November 16, 1936.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin Snow, of Boise, Idaho, and A. E. Bowen, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellant.

Frank L. Stephan and J. H. Blandford, both of Twin Falls, Idaho, and Richards & Haga, of Boise, Idaho, for appellee.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MATHEWS, Circuit Judges.


WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Appellee's petition for rehearing shows a misapprehension of the meaning and purport of our decision. The main difficulty with the so-called rules is that they are not interpretive of the decree, but cover a field not covered by the decree. As pointed out in the opinion: "The decree is conclusive on the parties and the rights thereby established are not subject to further inquiry."

In its petition for rehearing appellee states the issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases