IN RE MUNSON S. S. LINE

No. 77.

82 F.2d 289 (1936)

In re MUNSON S. S. LINE. FOUST v. MUNSON S. S. LINE et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 10, 1936.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gazan & Caldwell, of New York City, for appellant Foust.

Tompkins, Boal & Tompkins and White & Case, all of New York City (Arthur M. Boal, Charles J. Fay, and Alfred N. Heuston, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The appellant's additional brief states that he is unwilling to stipulate that he will not use any judgment, that might be secured in the state court, to prove his claim as administrator against the estate of the debtor. One of the reasons he gives for not so stipulating is that the liability policy contains a deductible clause whereby the insured Munson Steamship Line became self-insurer for the first $2,500 of the claim and "as the value of the Foust...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases