1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 15 F.Supp.
  5. 15 F.Supp. 351 (1936)
 

KRAUSZ v. UNITED STATES

No. 42802.

15 F.Supp. 351 (1936)

KRAUSZ et al. v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

June 29, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard H. Wilmer, of Washington, D. C. (Douglas L. Hatch, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiffs.

Elizabeth B. Davis, of Washington, D. C., and Robert H. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.

Before BOOTH, Chief Justice, and GREEN, LITTLETON, WILLIAMS, and WHALEY, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for new trial is based largely upon the contention that the court erred in the views expressed in the opinion with reference to the authority of the Alien Custodian to file a claim for refund, but it is not necessary to discuss this question as the decision of the court did not depend upon the ruling on this point. What was stated with reference to this matter in the former opinion was merely for the purpose of showing the incongruity which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases